11 replies to this topic

[Liam]

I'm switching from Nikon to Canon, but after I buy my new camera, I probably won't have enough money to purchase a new telephoto, so I was considering using a Nikon Lens/Canon body adapter. The problem is, my telephoto is a Sigma for Nikon product. Would that work with a Nikon Lens/Canon Body adapter?

[meghann]

I wouldn't see why not.

[Joejr14]

Shouldn't have problems. The mount is the same. Why are you switching again??

[GreatHorn]

Why are you switching again??

Probably because he wants better images?

No, just kidding (sort of). I love the work you do with a Nikon, Joe.

[meghann]

Why are you switching again??

Because he's a traitor. :-P

[JimBob]

I honestly don't see what's wrong with nikon. I use my moms Nikon D5100, and my Canon SX40. I love both, and in fact, I like the Nikon more, for many different reasons.

[lyceel]

Because he's a traitor. :-P

Indeed. We've lost another one to the dark side... So sad...

[Liam]

Haha, you guys!

I've always preferred Canon. My first camera was a Canon so I developed a love for the company. I need a new body anyway, and now's my chance to switch back.

I'll be saving up for the 400mm f/5.6L or 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, and I'll need a Canon body.

I don't have a problem with Nikon (or I wouldn't have used one these three years), I just prefer Canon.

Plus, this guy's been a great inspiration ever since I was a little Liam, and he uses mostly Canon: http://www.bobsteelephoto.com/

[canon eos]

I'm switching from Nikon to Canon, but after I buy my new camera, I probably won't have enough money to purchase a new telephoto, so I was considering using a Nikon Lens/Canon body adapter. The problem is, my telephoto is a Sigma for Nikon product. Would that work with a Nikon Lens/Canon Body adapter?

Yes, it would 'work', but I personally would not recommend it. You will lose many 'features', including auto-focus. Plus, considering the cost of a good adapter like Novoflex, the real benefit is negligible. If you had some pricey Nikon (mount) lenses, it may be worth it, but not with a so-so lens to start with.

Here's an article on this:

http://photographyli...nses-canon-dslr

[lyceel]

I'll be saving up for the 400mm f/5.6L or 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, and I'll need a Canon body.

Honestly, like I said in another thread, that's a hard argument to counter. I wonder how many enthusiast birders (or wildlife shooters in general) Nikon has lost, simply because they don't have an answer for those two lenses.

I had to spend twice as much to get a lens combo that may or may not be as effective (70-200mm f/2.8 + 2.0x TC). Sure the 70-200mm is a phenomenal lens, but it's crippled a bit by the TC, and I need the TC for reach. The only other options are a 300mm f/2.8 + 1.4x TC (much heavier and even more expensive), or a 300mm f/4 + 1.4 TC (cheaper, but no VR). Obviously, a dedicated 400mm f/5.6 would be a much better option to any of these.

There's also the 200-400mm f/4, which is a superb lens, but it's really in another league in both weight and price.

Are you listening, Nikon???

[JimBob]

Plus, this guy's been a great inspiration ever since I was a little Liam, and he uses mostly Canon: http://www.bobsteelephoto.com/

Oh my goodness! He's amazing!!!!!!!!

[Doug Herr]

Yes, it would 'work', but I personally would not recommend it. You will lose many 'features', including auto-focus. Plus, considering the cost of a good adapter like Novoflex, the real benefit is negligible. If you had some pricey Nikon (mount) lenses, it may be worth it, but not with a so-so lens to start with.

Agreed. If you're intent on switching systems, keep saving until you can buy the whole system, not just a piece of it. BTW I'm a Canon/Nikon agnostic.