|
|
Etiquette
Last post 05-16-2008, 1:04 PM by spottedowl. 55 replies.
-
05-13-2008, 3:16 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 3:47 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 4:34 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 6:06 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 6:42 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 6:59 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 7:20 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 7:47 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 7:47 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 8:16 PM |
-
05-13-2008, 8:32 PM |
-
snowyowl
-
-
-
Joined on 07-27-2006
-
-
Posts 1,446
-
-
|
Yeah, someone actually did that, or the subject would never have arisen. If you wish to delete a post, for whatever reason, before anyone has responded, why would anyone care? For that matter, no one would even know. However, after someone responds, the software will no longer allow you to make a deletion. Not so with edits, so one has to use discretion. Incidentally, making an honest mistake is no reason to feel embarrassed - it's just part of the learning process.
|
|
-
05-13-2008, 8:42 PM |
-
Chris Bourg
-
-
-
Joined on 09-26-2005
-
Denver CO
-
Posts 1,332
-
-
|
I agree that things have gotten very "guessy" on this forum lately.
I've birding for a few years, and still consider myself a beginner. Most of what I know has been learned from this forum. I post quite a few photos, even when I think I know what they are, because fairly often someone more experienced points out something important I've missed.
There are some very expert contributors here who have really raised the level of the forum over the last year or so. I'm very grateful to them for sharing what they have learned from years of experience and study.
I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with posting a guess, but I usually try to resist the urge. When there are too many wild-a** guesses, the forum starts to become less reliable. Like recently, when someone posted a seat-of-the-pants guess and then a string other posters chimed in with "I agree", "me too", "yeah, that's right". Finally someone who knew what they were talking about corrected the erroneous ID, and explained why it was incorrect.
Chris from Denver
|
|
-
-
05-13-2008, 10:10 PM |
-
pumakopp
-
-
-
Joined on 04-04-2007
-
Sacramento
-
Posts 368
-
-
|
Yeah, I remember someone on this very stream who "agrees", changed one of their first posts....someone posted an obvious picture of a female Red-winged Blackbird and was suggesting it was a Cape May Warbler, and as I finished replying what it really was, I saw an almost simultaneous post (by one of our top 10 responders now!) that said, and I quote: "I really don't see what else it could be"....As I began chuckling to myself and attempting to reply to the mis-identifier, I noticed their original post was nowhere to be seen and instead in its place was a post that read "Definitely female Red-winged Blackbird", with no acknowledgement to my correct identification or their mis identification.
I think after a bird has been identified, and if you have no problem with the ID, there really is no reason to agree with the identification unless there is some uncertainty involved. Just to echo: "Definitely" 'this or that', seems unnecessary. And if one does feel it necessary to pile on the affirmatives, they should acknowledge that they are agreeing with the already pointed-to correct answer, and not respond as if they are ID'ing the bird by themselves for the first time.
Dan Kopp Sacramento Many dreams come true, and some have silver linings; I live for my dream and a pocketful of gold...
|
|
-
05-13-2008, 10:37 PM |
-
MaBo
-
-
-
Joined on 05-02-2008
-
-
Posts 81
-
-
|
None of this really matters. I like the forum the way it is. (Although I do find it shameful that someone (especially an experienced birder) should suggest that inexperienced people interested in birds shouldn't be making guesses regarding bird identification). If you find the guesses too wild, ignore them. If you find there are superfluous agreements on IDs (which I do), ignore them. If someone is changing their responses in order to appear smarter (which I don't condone), ignore them too. I understand that these things can be annoying to different people but ALL forums are like that (and hopefully it will never change). Let's check our egos and get back to the birds. Andrew
Andrew Ritchie Victoria, British Columbia Formerly St. John's, Newfoundland "I hope you love birds too. It is economical. It saves going to heaven." - Emily Dickinson
|
|
Page 1 of 4 (56 items)
1
|
|
|