Whatbird.com

RJP:Separating perched Broad-wingeds from Red-shoulders can be difficult, especially on immature birds (which this isn't).  I would call this a Broad-winged for the following reasons 1) underside markings are dense on the upper breast, forming a bib.  2) undertail pattern, although similar in the two species, looks better for ...

It's hard to tell for sure, but there appear to be translucent ''windows'' around the primaries of each wing.  That trait is a diagnostic characteristic of red-shouldered hawks, so if I see it correctly, that's what you have here.  I'd love to read what others think, though.

I like red-shouldered hawk for this one.

Is there a larger version of this, perhaps?

The last two pictures look like EDIT: broad-winged hawk(s), the one before it looks like a juvenile Cooper's hawk.  I'm not one of the experts around here, though.

Female, too.  For me, a much better find than a red-shouldered hawk (of which I see several a week), but I don't know which is more common or easier to find in Florida.

I would agree with that ID. I'd like to see more of these pictures, too.  Fun stuff!

I'll second sharp-shinned and add that it's legs are thin enough to reasonably fit the ID along with the other characteristics.  Nape is also quite dark, though it's not 100% diagnostic on an immature bird as this one.  It's definitely an Accipiter. FWIW, Broad-winged hawks shouldn't be anywhere near Michigan/Ohio in early February.

RJP:and a Merlin.  Good bird! Very nice shot of one, too.

neef:That white tail band suggests a Northern Harrier.  Were you near any open space or was the area wooded? Hard to define.  The area in general is wooded, but this particular spot represents a very narrow strip of woods (about 30-120 wide in different spots).  On one side is a major river of the region.  On the other side ...